Accounts payable
Review invoices before approval or payment release.
Invoice Intelligence Suite
Score invoice records using duplicate indicators, missing purchase orders, price and quantity variance, tax differences and supplier risk signals.
Score invoice records using duplicate, PO, value, tax and supplier-control indicators.
Upload a CSV or Excel file to begin.
Business context
Invoice risk scoring combines several warning signals so accounts-payable reviewers can focus on the records most likely to create duplicate payment, pricing, receipt, tax or supplier-control exposure.
This guidance is designed for people who need to use invoice risk scorer results in a real approval, planning or operational workflow.
Review invoices before approval or payment release.
Confirm invoice values against purchase orders and agreed prices.
Strengthen payment controls and investigate material exceptions.
Input guide
| Column | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier * | Vendor responsible for the invoice. | Northstar Packaging |
| Invoice Number * | Supplier invoice reference. | INV-4812 |
| Invoice Amount * | Gross invoice value. | 48200 |
| Duplicate / PO / Variance Indicators * | Control fields used to create the risk score. | Duplicate=true; Price variance=5% |
Mapping note: Use consistent dates, currencies, units and definitions. A correct calculation based on inconsistent inputs can still lead to a poor decision.
Use the analysis as a controlled decision-support step: prepare reliable data, review the exceptions, verify the cause and document the action taken.
Clean the source data and confirm the required fields and reporting period.
Run the tool and prioritise the most important invoice risk results.
Validate the cause with contracts, transactions and operational evidence.
Assign actions, export the report and measure improvement in the next cycle.
Decision support
These actions are practical review priorities. Apply your organisation's approval limits, tolerance rules and contractual requirements.
Immediate
Start with records that have the greatest financial, service or operational effect. Confirm the source data before taking action.
Next
Separate genuine performance or demand movement from data quality, timing, unit, currency and process issues.
Monitor
Run the analysis on a consistent schedule, record decisions and compare whether corrective actions improve the next period.
Practical examples
The same result can require a different response depending on product criticality, shelf life, contract terms, service impact and available alternatives.
A high-value invoice has no PO and a possible duplicate flag.
Expected outcome: The record is moved to the payment-hold queue for source-document verification.
A routine invoice has complete controls and no material variance.
Expected outcome: It proceeds through standard approval without delaying the batch.
Combine several accounts-payable warning signals into one transparent score so reviewers can prioritise the invoices most likely to need a payment hold.
No. Supported CSV and Excel files are processed locally in your browser.
No. Use the result to prioritise review and confirm every decision against source documents and authorised controls.
Yes. Set the percentage tolerance before running the analysis. Use limits approved by your organisation.
It can compare a taxable amount, percentage rate and reported tax, but it does not determine the correct legal treatment for a jurisdiction.